- Home
- GARKANE SCANDAL FACTS
- FACT 1: Rotation Period
- FACT 2: Legal HiJacking
- FACT 3: The Broken Law
- FACT 4: The Board "Gift"
- FACT 5: Supremacy Clause
- FACT 6: Account 266
- FACT 7: The Confession
- FACT 8: Chief Sponsor(s)
- FACT 9: Pure Discrepancy
- FACT 10: Intent
- FACT 11: Retain and Use?
- FACT 12: Member Betrayal
- FACT 13: Subvert Returns
- Fact 14: Garkane Respect?
- Fact 15: The Shortfall
- Fact 16: Co-Op Purpose
- Fact 17: Implied Promise
- Fact 18: Who allowed it?
- Fact 19: The Endorsement
- Fact 20: There are others
- Fact 21: The Collusion
- Fact 22: The Coffin Nail
THE STATE LAW HB 266
What an opportunity!
In 1995, when it was realized that the creation of unclaimed property was preventing the promise to return all margins to members from fulfillment, the Garkane CEO and Board of Directors did not revise policy to correct that problem. Instead, they decided to take member property they promised to return and create an account they could spend for their own use? The stipulated uses were selected and lobbied by the Board and CEO.
SUCCESSFUL LOBBYING ANNOUCED
